Who thinks movie whould of been better with Spew and Bagman. - Page 2

kreacher99 · #11 (**permalink**) 09-08-2009, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DesQueJ'teVois

Winky and Bagman I would have enjoyed alot

SPEW i didn't like so much in the books so, I probably wouldn't have enjoyed it all that much in the movie.

Overall, I liked the movie the way it was, and I don't see where these scene's could have been added without making some changes to the layout of the movie, and i'm sure that was the decision that WB/the director had to make .

Very excellent points DesQueJ'teVois, the filmmakers really have to judge what elements to have and leave out of the movie, the required elements to tell the story and entertain the audience are in the movie. We can say yeah or nay about but the movie is good.

Which characters to put in the movie, and which that can be left out without altering the story line to much. The Bagman story is Famous Quidditch Player and Ministry Official with a gambling problem is an interesting story in the book, however the filmmakers decided not to tell it in the movie.

Personally I am glad they left Winky out of the movie, its a miserable story with winky endup as an alcoholic. Since that story really drove SPEW in the book, leaving it as part of the Winky story seemed to be the film makers decision.

The monsters and creatures in the third trial may not have worked the way the film makers wanted, since they have none, or it might have been how long do the film makers want to keep the audience scared, the trial does come just before Harry meets Voldemort, and that part is very long in the movie.

CharlieLow · #12 (**permalink**) 10-04-2009, 01:36 PM

Quote:

The long pointy KKK hats on the death eaters really was not how I saw them. Glad that did not continue in the later films.

I agree with this so much!!! Me and my friend were watching it a couple of weeks ago...and we were suddenly like "Are those hats SUPPOSED to look like KKK hats?"

>_<

Also, I really missed Bagman! I wanted to see him in his Kilt and Poncho :P

james laurie · #13 (**permalink**) 10-06-2009, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kreacher99

Very excellent points DesQueJ'teVois, the filmmakers really have to judge what elements to have and leave out of the movie, the required elements to tell the story and entertain the audience are in the movie. We can say yeah or nay about but the movie is good.

Which characters to put in the movie, and which that can be left out without altering the story line to much. The Bagman story is Famous Quidditch Player and Ministry Official with a gambling problem is an interesting story in the book, however the filmmakers decided not to tell it in the movie.

Personally I am glad they left Winky out of the movie, its a miserable story with winky endup as an alcoholic. Since that story really drove SPEW in the book, leaving it as part of the Winky story seemed to be the film makers decision.

The monsters and creatures in the third trial may not have worked the way the film makers wanted, since they have none, or it might have been how long do the film makers want to keep the audience scared, the trial does come just before Harry meets Voldemort, and that part is very long in the movie.

I thought movie was bad nothing like book at all.

CharlieLow · #14 (**permalink**) 10-26-2009, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james laurie

I thought movie was bad nothing like book at all.

I did think that the movie was nothing like the book, but I still thought the movie was awesome (:

RumirVolkov · #15 (**permalink**) 11-24-2009, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james laurie

I think they chould of cut Harry and Ron not talking and inculde SPEW instead.

You're awesome.

faithful_servent · #16 (**permalink**) 03-24-2010, 09:42 PM

i think it would have been better i dont know why they removed spew in the first place because its kinda important in a way and bagman would have been funny. i didnt really like spew but it still contributed to the plot and stuff

gringotts_goblin · #17 (**permalink**) 04-16-2010, 04:04 AM

It really needed SPEW. (lol gross)

But seriously it was such a big part of Hermiones role in that book, and it was a pretty comedic few chapters of the book, that always made me laugh.

At least somebodys standing up for the house-elves.

Harry Neil · #18 (**permalink**) 04-16-2010, 10:45 AM

Yeah, I would have liked the movie if they hadn't changed so much of it

**Liam Spencer** · #19 (**permalink**) 04-17-2010, 10:28 AM

Bagman is awesome!!! He plays for my quidditch team Wimbourne Wasps

hermiones_bookworm01 · #20 (**permalink**) 07-12-2010, 07:27 AM

I think both would've been a wonderful addition to the movie, because I enjoyed those parts in the book a lot! I mean Bagman was such a comical character in some ways, even though he was also a cheat, it would've made it a lot better to have him announce the Quidditch World Cup, and the tasks for the Tri-wizard Tournament. Also the part where he's sitting on the grass with the Weasleys and talking to Barty Crouch was such a fun part in the book.

I also would've love to have seen S.P.E.W. and to see Hermione focus on that, and then when it came time for the Yule Ball you would see Hermione not thinking about that, but enjoying the dance. It would've added more comedic bits to what is somewhat a dark book and movie.