She killed off all the characters basically in the first couple of books, where she had build up the characters,
and btw,
if youh VIEW my posts
PLEASE COMMENT on them

thanks youh x

Ya well, if it wasn't for her none of us would be here....so live with it.

__________________

Don't them let me get teary, the world looks dreary,
but when you wipe your eyes, see it clearly.
There's no need for you to fear me,
if you take your time to hear me,
maybe you can learn to cheer me.
It ain't about black or white, 'cause we're human,
I hope we see the light before its ruined...
...my ghetto gospel...

R.I.P. 2pac

LOL,
but there would be something else,
we'd all be in some twilight saga forum or something,
theres probably one already. =.=

As weird as it sounds, characters' deaths are one of the things that make HP good. Without them, the story has no sense of intensity or emotion. How frightful an evil overlord would Voldemort be if he didn't kill anybody? They'd have no reason to fear him, and just let him laugh maniacally while they went about their lives. Every book would read like a teen-crush fanfic that's hundreds of pages long.

I could go on, but I think you get the point-- deaths are necessary in lots of stories to make them forceful.

__________________

It also proves j.k rowlings plot to kill off some characaters just proves that the book aren't just aimed for kids because of the violent deaths in the books.

__________________
Hermione Granger and The Chamber Of Secrets

In the interview J.K. Rowling: A Year in the Life, it is said that the book is filled with many fatherly figures. But, as we all know, she ends up killing many of them. The book would have to real emotion if some of the great characters weren't killed.

__________________

The only deaths in the first couple of books are as follows:
From Philosopher's Stone:
James and Lily Potter
Quirinius Quirrell
Cuthbert Binns
Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (Nearly Headless Nick)
Nicolas and Perenelle Flamel
^And four of them were dead prior to the first chapter; unless you don't count James and Lily, which you should. Without their immediate deaths, there's no story.

From Chamber of Secrets:
Moaning Myrtle
The Basilisk
^One of these deaths is a good thing and the other happened thirty-nine years prior to Harry Potter's birth.

Those deaths are hardly "all characters".

In my personal opinion, deaths are good because it intensifies a story. Makes it a bit more dramatic and creates an emotional attachment with the reader; especially if the character is well-loved or even well-hated.

well someone or someTHING is always killed.
there's at least ONE death in them.
and so youh noe,
there's jest SOOO many in the last book D:

naaw,
blair and serena
CHUUCCCK <3

Then I suggest you start reading bed-time stories...

__________________

Don't them let me get teary, the world looks dreary,
but when you wipe your eyes, see it clearly.
There's no need for you to fear me,
if you take your time to hear me,
maybe you can learn to cheer me.
It ain't about black or white, 'cause we're human,
I hope we see the light before its ruined...
...my ghetto gospel...

R.I.P. 2pac

ahha no,
they're pretty epic,
but that's effort.
i prefer my boooks,
eg/ Boy in the Striped Pajamas, the Hardy Boys, Alex Rider Series.
Yeah 'm one cool cat ;D
-jokes-